Sunday, 24 February 2008

Not a mashed spud

As I said in my initial post, I’m not really a big fan of blogs. However, since hypocrisy seems to be on my menu just now, I feel like indulging in something else I grossly dislike, namely the kind whiney, naval-gazing, middle-class writing that Messrs Parsons, Hornby ,Coe and Fielding[1] seem to be so willing to inflict upon the world. Recently though people have made comments to me that have gotten me staring at my abdomen and thinking and it seems as though this blog is the best place to put these ponderences.

These comments have all concerned the way I say things with the common theme that I am quite an outspoken person. This is not a new allegation to be made to me but the intensity of the comments has gotten me contemplating myself.

My manner of speaking has gotten me into trouble throughout my life. In no particular order, here are some of a few faux-pas that I have managed to utter in the last few years:

  • Asking Jim Wallace (then Scotland’s deputy First Minister) if he’d ever be enough of a success to drop the word deputy from his job description. The room laughed, he got chippy.
  • Asking Michael Howard (the son of Jewish refugees) in an interview if he though the PR voting system was creating a Scottish Weimar Republic. The interview ended soon after.
  • Describing a girl as the 19th hole on a golf course. I was referring to her ability to consume booze (bars on golf courses are usually called “The 19th Hole”), she thought otherwise.
  • When asked if a very heterosexual girl was a lesbian replying “She’s got more spunk in her than the average man.”
  • Telling someone with a girlfriend named Dawn that he must go to bed at 10.30pm. When asked why replying: “You have to go to bed early if you want to see the crack of Dawn!” He was unamused.

In the last few weeks I’ve been accused a girl named Louise of frequently lowering the tone of any conversation. I’ve been labelled “Master of Wit” by a guy named Phil I immediately told him he was two letters out, to which he replied: “See!” And then there was the simple comment from comment from a woman known only as the Broom: “You’re quite direct aren’t you Duncan.”

The naval-gazing and past-contemplation that these comment encouraged led me into an astute state of fear. Is my future going to be that of a low-brow commentator on life, a kind of soul mate to Jim Davidson and Roy Chubby Brown? Or will my “Master of Wit” persona turn me into a 21st century P. G. Wodhouse doing for low-lives what he did for high society? Neither of these visions has made me particularly happy, leading me to consider whether I need to somehow fundamentally re-develop my personality.

However a further, slightly more bizarre comment from the aforementioned Broom got me thinking that maybe having an outspoken temperament isn’t necessarily a bad thing. She described me as: “Not a mashed potato person,” which, she assures me, means that I am simply not dull. The primary reason for me being not dull: my outspokenness.

Perhaps then this means instead of heading towards being Roy Chubby Brown or Jim Davidson, I am actually heading towards the status that has been accorded the outspoken likes of Jeremy Clarkson, Tony Benn or Margo MacDonald, namely being ‘a character.’

Being dubbed ‘a character’ can be a poisoned chalice. Tony Benn was always ‘a character’ yet his career ended in seminal disappointment. Mind you, Winston Churchill was also ‘a character’ and look where he ended up.

Time will tell whether I end up as being ‘a character’ or just a simple loudmouth. For the moment though I’ve decided not to try to remould my personality and will instead concentrate on living up to my status as a master of wit with an amazing ability to lower the tone of any conversation.

Willy.



[1] Ok, so she’s technically a Mme. Flowing prose over factual accuracy, whatever next?

Thursday, 14 February 2008

My Valentine's Day

Another year, another Valentine’s Day spent by myself doing something to take my mind off the fact that it is perhaps my least favourite day of the year. This year I have decided to do this by listening to music about failed relationships (Bruce Springsteen at present) and indulging in my latest enforced hobby, blogging. But none of these can take away my intense hatred of February 14th, .

Before I go any further, there are bound to be people reading this (an assertion if ever there was one) who will accuse me of bitterness, and perhaps they are right. I broke up with my last girlfriend two years ago tomorrow and since then my love life has been more barren than the Sahara desert during a heatwave. In the time I’ve been alone, my ex has gotten married – I heard about it via Facebook. Add to this that I didn’t get any cards this year, nor did I have anyone to send one to, and I’m sure that many could accuse me of sour grapes.

However, there are many reason’s to hate Valentine’s Day. First of all, look at the time of year. It’s February, is this really a good month to hold a celebration of all things romantic? The trees are bare, the roads are covered in grit salt and every other person you meet is carrying a tissue full of green/yellow material recently extracted from their nose. Romantic, I think not. Christmas Visa bills are also still weighing heavily on our minds. So at a time when the scenery is far from picturesque, illness is in the air and nobody’s got much money we are all suddenly expected to spend a day throwing cash around and devoting ourselves to our significant others. Surely, if a day such as Valentine’s is needed, May would be a better month to hold it.

Our shops become havens of tacky paraphernalia. Six-foot high badly made teddies with “Be Mine” inscribed upon them, CDs with titles like “The Ultimate Love” keeping Phil Collins and Celine Dion in royalties for another year and greeting cards with the kind of retching prose that even those two wouldn’t include in their songs. To be blunt, the merchandise is crap. I’ve never understood why people consider it a sign of adoration to give or receive something they would never be able to display publically without suffering gross outbursts of embarrassment.

And then there is the cynical profiteering of other industries involved in the Valentine debacle. Restaurants, confectioners and florists do extremely well out of Valentine’s Day, charging extortionate prices for what is no more than normal produce. Ask them whether the day is about love or money and they’ll tell you to close the till on your way out, darling.

The worst of it is that the people who have the power to stop all this, namely us, do nothing. I have heard people express their own dislike of Valentine’s Day in every year that I can consciously remember and I’m sure many others could testify to the same, so it can be assumed that discontent like mine is widely felt. Yet every year we still go out in the freezing cold to buy garish gifts and eat dinner in overpriced sub-standard restaurants.

I personally believe we need we need to examine why we celebrate this day. There were at least three saints called Valentine, all of whom were Catholic martyrs in the first couple of Christian centuries. Not much is known of any of them, and even what is known doesn’t point to them being great romantics. The idea of modern Valentine’s Day seems to have arisen through a Chaucer love poem mentioning the day by coincidence.

What seems likely is that Valentine’s is a hangover from Roman festivals of fertility, which were often held in February. Perhaps we need to revisit this as an idea. We would need to celebrate a modern fertility festival indoors, thus avoiding the February weather and the extortion in one fell swoop. There would also be no need to buy any gifts. Now this is the kind of celebration I could go in for.

Then again, maybe I am just bitter…

Tuesday, 12 February 2008

Necessity dictates

To be frank, as it would seem appropriate to be, I have never really seen much point in blogging. If I want to read semi-literate ramblings about the state of the world I ususally just head for the nearest gents and read the graffiti on the wall. However, I'm a pragmatist and had a rather stern lecture today about the neccessity of embracing the blogosphere if you are an aspirant journalist. So hear I am, let's just hope the world is ready.